I'm
Still Here — Oscar for Best International Film in 2025
The
film I'm Still Here (original title: Ainda Estou Aqui, 2024) is
directed by Walter Salles and stars Fernanda Torres, Selton Mello,
and Fernanda Montenegro. The film is based on the 2015 biographical
and historical text of the same name, written by Marcelo Rubens
Paiva, who is one of the characters in the film and the son of Rubens
and Eunice Paiva.
The film attracted international attention,
being selected for more than 50 festivals and winning 26 awards in
Brazil and abroad. Among them is the award for Best Screenplay at the
Venice Film Festival. The film was selected at the Goya Awards as the
Best Ibero-American Film. It received six prizes from the American
Gold Derby Awards website, and finally, it won the Oscar for Best
International Film in 2025 (Globoplay, 2025).
Rio
de Janeiro, 1971
The
Paivas, a traditional middle-class family, lived in Rio de Janeiro in
the early 1970s. The family consisted of Rubens, the father; Eunice,
the mother; and their five children: Vera, Sílvia, Eliana, Ana
Lúcia, Marcelo, and Maria Beatriz.
Rubens Paiva is a federal
deputy who was impeached by the military government.
The
family's lives followed a familiar rhythm until one day when federal
agents invaded their home, turning their world upside down. This
invasion was a brutal and unjustifiable act of violence.
The
federal agents took Rubens to jail. Eunice doesn't understand what is
happening. He became desperate.
Some
agents started living in their home. Family members couldn't even use
the landline without being overheard by an agent. These situations
traumatized the entire family.
Rubens was considered a
communist by the political system.
Eunice
and her daughter, Eliana, were taken to jail for interrogation
without justification. Eliana was only there for a day, but Eunice
stayed for many. The policeman interrogating Eunice knew she played
backgammon and that her daughter, Veronica, lived in London.
He
also knew that Rubens helped rebels send and receive letters from
their families.
While
in prison, Eunice was put under severe psychological pressure to
reveal information about her husband's political activities. She
didn't know anything, nor did the wives of some of Rubens's friends.
They, husbands, didn't tell their wives about their political
activities to protect their families. A friend of the family told
Eunice that many of Rubens's friends helped other political
activists, but they did not engage in the armed struggle.
Eunice
lost track of time. She asked a soldier how long she had been in
prison. He replied that it had been five days. She began marking the
days on the wall.
The
soldier who took her to and from her interrogation covered his name
tag with tape so the prisoners wouldn't know his name.
After
many days in prison without showering or changing her clothes, she
was released. At home, she took a long shower and scrubbed her body
vigorously. Whether consciously or not, this shower symbolized her
desire to be free from all the terrible things she had suffered
during those days under the political system's rules.
Eunice
was a strong woman who stood up to the military and the many
hardships she faced in life, including having her husband arrested
and being responsible for five children. After some time, she
suspected that the regime had killed her husband.
She
asked some friends for help. They comforted her, saying that Rubens
would be released soon because there was no proof that he had
contributed to the opponents of the system, who were generally called
communists.
With
the help of a lawyer, Eunice initiated a habeas corpus petition to
free Rubens, but to no avail. She requested a copy of the document to
read and understand it. Although she did not understand the law, she
made an effort to improve her understanding in order to get her
husband back or at least find out what happened to him after he went
to prison.
She
saw the family car at an army barracks. So she and her lawyer went to
retrieve it. They were successful.
One
characteristic of many middle-class Brazilian families in the 1970s
was having a housekeeper. Her name was Zezé. After Rubens went to
prison, the family was short on money and in debt to Zezé.
Eunice
was looking for Marta because she had been told that Marta—a
teacher of some of her children—had seen Rubens in the army
barracks. Marta avoided giving Eunice any information because she was
afraid of the military's political system. Some time later, Marta
delivered an envelope to Eunice's house containing information about
Rubens's death.
Rubens
was dead, but there was no news about where his body was.
Eunice
wasn't educated, but she tried to learn about the laws and details
that would help her learn more about Rubens's disappearance. Despite
this, she criticized the federal government for using legal jargon
and called for freedom of expression for the Brazilian people.
She
sold their properties in Rio de Janeiro and moved with her family to
São Paulo, where she could receive support from her extended family.
São
Paulo, 1996
Eunice
studied law and became a lawyer. She worked against land grabbers.
She was well-known in society and was constantly invited to give
lectures.
Twenty-five
years after Rubens’ disappearance, she received his death
certificate. In an interview, she demanded compensation and an
explanation for the government's mistakes during the military regime.
São
Paulo, 2014
All
of Eunice’s children were at her home. She was very old and used a
wheelchair. She watched TV.
The
movie does not show anything new, at least for those who know a
little about Brazilian history.
However,
it does present some errors; for example, the plugs that appear in
the scenes are not compatible with the 1970s.
The
transition from 1971 to 1996 is poorly executed; it lasts a few
seconds in complete darkness.
Strength
and weaknesses
In
general, the lighting in the production is poor. There was no need to
show defective images to give the impression that the movie is from
the 1970s; it was made in 2024. Audiences deserve better lighting and
images. There is often a rectangle on the right side of the screen.
What is the purpose of that? The audience knows it's a movie about
Brazilian history.
In
my opinion, the film's only redeeming quality is that Brazilian
cinema will now be better known worldwide. This benefits the
Brazilian film industry and its associated professionals, including
actors, producers, and technicians.
References
Salles,
Walter. Ainda Estou Aqui (movie)/I’m still here. 2024.
Globoplay.
Ainda Estou Aqui ganha novo pôster oficial após vitória no Oscar.
2025. Disponível em:
https://gshow.globo.com/globoplay/noticia/ainda-estou-aqui-ganha-novo-poster-oficial-apos-vitoria-no-oscar.ghtml.
Acesso em: 11 mar. 2025.